album-art
Reading Time: 14 minutes [2550 words]

The Atlanta Constitution,

Wednesday, 22nd October 1913,

PAGE 1, COLUMN 4.

Only Sheriff and

Officers of

His Force Talked to

Mem-

Bers of the Frank

Jury Dur-

ing Trial.

To the thirty-odd affidavits made public yesterday in the

exchange of affidavits between the state and the defense in the

Leo M. Frank motion, which comes up today, several new ones

were added Tuesday afternoon by the state. The additional

affidavits were from the various deputy sheriffs and bailiffs and

were denials that anyone but officers of the court had talked to

the Frank jurors.

The state has prepared affidavits from the various jurors in

which they declare that only the legal evidence influenced them

and also deny that they were swayed by the cheering for the

solicitor, or that any of them were biased, or discussed the case

among themselves prior to Judge L. S. Roan's charge.

The state is preparing to impeach several of the maker of

affidavits against Jurors A. H. Henslee and M. Johenning in which it

was charged that these two men had, before the trial, expressed

animus towards the defendant, then indicted for the murder of

Mary Phagan.

Aaron Out on Bond.

Samuel Aaron, whose affidavit states that Henslee declared

at the Elks' club that he wanted to see Frank hang, is now out on

a $500 bond from Justice C. H. Girardeau's court, where he is

charged with larceny. He is due to appear Saturday morning for a

hearing. A detective discovered this when working in the interests

of the state Tuesday afternoon and it is believed that the state

intends to bring this in an effort to impeach Aaron's testimony.

T. M. Webb also furnished the state with an affidavit in which

he declared he would not believe Aaron on oath.

From W. J. Clayton, of the Central Carriage company,

Solicitor General Hugh M. Dorsey secured an affidavit in which

Clayton asserted that he would not believe W. P. Neill on oath.

Neill was one of the defense's affiants who stated that during the

trial he saw a spectator in the courtroom grab a juror by the arm

and talk to him.

Other affidavits supporting the character and standing of

both Henslee and Johenning were made public by the state and

also Henslee denies that he was in various Georgia towns at the

time it is alleged he gave vent to expressions of bias.

That the hearing of the motion will be taken up Wednesday

morning without doubt was the statement made by both the

solicitor and Attorneys Luther Z. Rosser and Reuben R. Arnold,

attorney's for the defense.

I know for no reason in the world why the hearing should

not be taken up tomorrow, said Attorney Rosser in his office

Tuesday, where he and Attorney Arnold were discussing the case.

We won't be the ones to postpone it, added Mr. Arnold.

There certainly will be no effort on our part to prolong it,

was Solicitor Dorsey's comment when asked as to the possibility

of another postponement.

Will Decide on Place.

The attorneys for both sides will meet at 9 o'clock in the

chambers of Judge L. S. Roan on the fourth floor of the Thrower

building and will decided upon a place to hold court.

Judge Answer E. Calhoun's division of the city court is now

being held in the room which he and Judge Roan have used

alternately in the makeshift courthouse. In the old city hall

building the three divisions of superior court and the civil division

of the city court are in session.

Where the motion will be heard is yet unknown, but it is

believed that arrangements will be made for a hearing in one of

the courtrooms in the old city hall building, possibly the one in

which Frank was tried and convicted.

In affidavits from all the jurors,

Continued on Page

Nine.

JURY IS

DEFENDED

BY THIRTY

AFFIDAVITS

Continued From Page

One.

except F. V. L. Smith, who is out of town, the state endeavors to

prove that the jurors made their verdict only from the evidence

and were not swayed by the crowds in the courtroom and on the

streets, or by the prolonged cheering for the solicitor.

Deputy Sheriff Plennie Miner, who was in charge of the

courtroom during the trial, states in an affidavit that no one talked

with a juror as the jury was passing out of the courtroom.

Deputies Foster Hunter and Bob Deavors and Bailiffs Charlie

Huber and A. P. Pennington deny in affidavits that persons on the

streets approached and talked to the jurors as they were being

taken to and from the courtroom or eating place. The two bailiffs

deny that they heard cheering on August 22 and 23 while they

accompanied the jury to the hotel and to the restaurant.

In his affidavit, Henslee declares that he was telling the truth

when he answered the challenge when he was sworn in, and that

he later made his verdict from evidence and not from bias. He

also declares that he voted doubtful on the first ballot in order

to cause a free and open discussion among the jurors, and that

later when he cast his vote of guilty that he realized the gravity

of the situation and wept as he voted.

Never Formed an Opinion.

Henslee says that he, in common with everyone else, read

the newspaper accounts of the case and discussed it, but that he

never formed an opinion further than that whoever killed Mary

Phagan ought to hang.

The attacked juror denies that he was in Albana, Ga.,

between June 3 and September 18. He offers the affidavit of a

hotel clerk to support this statement.

Further, Henslee states that he does not know R. L. Gremer

in Albany. He states that he does not remember talking to Mack

Farkas in Albany, and that in his conversation with Sam Farkas he

did not say who he believed was guilty. These men, in affidavits,

declared that Henslee had expressed belief in Frank's guilt

previous to the trial.

Denies His Statement.

The juror also denies the statement of J. A. Lehan, who

declared that on the train, near Experiment Station, Henslee

expressed his belief in Frank's guilt. Henslee swears that on the

occasion mentioned he was not within 200 miles of Atlanta or

Experiment Station.

In answering the statements of Shi Gray, S. M. Johnson and

John M. Holmes, of Sparta, who stated that after Henslee had

been served with notice that he was draw on the Frank jury venire

that he was in Sparta, and expressed animus against Frank, the

juror declares that he was not there at the time. Henslee states

that he came to Atlanta from Athens on July 25 and received his

jury notice that night at 74 Oak street, West End, and did not

leave town until after the trial.

He declares that after Frank had been convicted he visited

Sparta and talked the case over with the three men and told them

he believed Frank guilty and a pervert.

Juror Johenning, the other one of twelve attacked by the

defense, denies the statement made by H. C. Lovenhart that he

express belief in Frank's guilt.

Johenning states that at one time, but not in the month

mentioned by them, that he talked with Mrs. Jennie Lovenhart and

Miss Miriam Levenhart and said in the conversation that the

newspapers seem to have convicted Frank, and that when they

expressed their belief in his innocence, that he replied, Well, the

outlook from the papers doesn't seem to be very bright for him. I

think he's going to have a hard time in getting loose.

Johenning declares further in his affidavit that at the time he

was sworn in as a juror that he held no bias or prejudice in his

mind.

In upholding Juror Johenning the state introduces the

affidavits of Dr. J. C. Robinson and F. W. McGarity and others, who

attest his good character. Juror Henslee is similarly upheld by W.

M. Howard, J. C. Collier, T. W. Cochran, P. L. Gordy, C. O.

Summers, J. E. Howard and other well known men of Barnesville,

and by J. D. Lochridge, of Douglas, Ga.

PAGE 3, COLUMN 4

BONDING COMPANY

IS

SUED AS

SECURITY

For the use of T. M. Smiley, doing business as the Smiley-

Sand company, the city of Atlanta brought suit yesterday against

the American Bonding company, of Baltimore, security for Chester

A. Daddy, who contracted to build A. Daddy, who contracted to

build the Peachtree disposal plant.

The suit is for $67.82, alleged to be a bill unpaid for sand

which Smiley supplied for the plant. That Daddy has been

adjudicated a bankrupt, and a receiver appointed for his affairs, is

stated in the petition filed in superior court by Attorneys Dorsey,

Shelton & Dorsey. The petition asks the principal sum, with

interest from February 5, 1913.

Recently the city brought a similar suit against the bonding

company for several thousand dollars, suing in that case for the

use of the R. O. Campbell Coal company, which has supplied lime

and cement and coal to Daddy.

PAGE 5, COLUMN 1

DETECTIVES

PROBE

CONSPIRACY

CHARGE

Capt. Burke Offers to

Furnish

Counsel for Shirley

With

Address of Joe Hicks

in

Birmingham.

Also suspecting a plot in the weird story of Ira W. Fisher,

the Birmingham witness, Captain C. W. Burke, who brought the

man to Atlanta for Rosser & Brandon, has offered to give to the

Atlanta police department the address of Joe Hicks, who is sought

as an accomplice of Fisher in the alleged conspiracy to blackmail

J. C. Shirley.

Burke stated that he was at a loss to explain Fisher's tale,

but that, so far, he had been utterly unable to catch the man in a

falsehood. Strong denial is made of the prisoner's accusation that

Burke held him forcibly in the Rosser offices in the Grant building

Sunday.

Captain Burke Puzzled.

I am at a loss to account for the whole affair, he declared.

It could have been caused by most anything. I would not be

surprised at whatever arose. However, if there is the least bit of

foundation to the suspicion of conspiracy to blackmail, I am

willing to do my share toward running it down.

I will first offer to do this much. That is, furnish the

detectives with the address of Joe Hicks. They seem to want him

badly. Hicks is suspicious. I caught him in several lies. I never did

relish his connection with the case, my attitude in which was

merely that of messenger.' I was sent to Birmingham to bring the

man to Atlanta. Beyond that, this was all I had to do with it.

I have washed my hands clean of Fisher. My work was

completed when I brought him to Atlanta and turned him over to

the men who had dispatched me for him. I am willing, though, to

pay his fare back to Alabama, which I agreed to do upon

requesting him to come over.

Will Send Man to Birmingham.

Plans are being made by counsel for J. C. Shirley to send a

private investigator to Birmingham to probe the connection of Joe

Hicks with Ira W. Fisher's accusation of Shirley, which created

such sensation in the Leo M. Frank case, and which has resulted

in Fisher's imprisonment on charge of libel.

Charles J. Graham, Shirley's attorney, declares that Hicks

should be arrested, and that a warrant will probably be issued

against him immediately upon the arrival of the investigator in

Birmingham. The Birmingham police have been notified, it is said,

and men put on the alleged accomplice's trial.

A development in the situation Tuesday that caused much

interest and speculation was a statement made by Probation

Officer Sidney J. Coogler, of police headquarters, to the effect that

he believed Fisher was verging on a breakdown, and, as a result,

would confess either to a conspiracy to blackmail Mr. Shirley or to

having concocted the weird tale during a spree from drink or

drugs.

Fisher Professed Religion.

Coogler, at one time, was Fisher's spiritual adviser. That

was when the prisoner was under probation from drunken and

disorderly conduct which he had created at home during the

latter part of 1912. Fisher professed religion, Mr. Coogler says,

and strove to throw off the shackles of drink.

The man has been on a terrible drunk, Coogler told

Constitution reporter. He is almost wild. It was either whiskey or

drug. I'm inclined to think it was both. He is getting sober now,

and regaining his normal sense. Then, I'm satisfied he will tell the

truth of the whole business.

Coogler visited Fisher's cell frequently Tuesday. When he

first called, Fisher maintained the story he has told all along. Mr.

Coogler impressed upon him the seriousness of his predicament,

and the penalty he would suffer in case of conviction. It seemed

to have its effect.

Later, when Coogler talked with the man, Fisher seemed in

a dilemma. He appeared confused and irresolute. The probation

chief remained in the cell for an hour or more, expecting each

moment the man to break down and tell his secret. Fisher finally

asked that Coogler leave the place, saying he wanted time to

think.

Very well, Ira, said Coogler as he stepped from the cell,

whenever you need me, don't hesitate to call.

Chief Lanford says that Fisher is endeavoring to shield Joe

Hicks in some manner. Monday night, while the mysterious

Witness was telling of Hicks accompanying him to the office of

the chief of police in Birmingham, Lanford pressed him closely

regarding the alleged accomplice. Fisher immediately strove to

shift the subject, obviously trying to have as little as possible to

say about the man.

Conspiracy Theory.

I believe this is a conspiracy and nothing else, said the

chief. It fell down purely because of Fisher's inability to tell a

plausible tale and supply the necessary details. He is a clever liar

"that much is plain"but, he can't undergo cross-examination

and get away with it.'

Attorney Graham intimates strongly that the case will be

put before the grand jury. Solicitor General Hugh Dorsey said,

however, that Graham had not communicated with him toward

this end. It is said that the lawyer and solicitor will confer some

time today after Fisher's hearing in Judge Puckett's court, which

will be held this morning. The exact hour has not yet been set.

Fisher does not want bond. He says he does not care to be

liberated. As to the outcome of the case, he tells reporters that it

cannot have but one end, and that is exoneration, as he is telling

the immaculate truth in every respect. He spends most of his

time pacing up and down the tier leading to his cell, smoking

cigarettes incessantly. He is nervous, in fact more so Tuesday

than at any other time since he first told his story.

That he will be prosecuted relentlessly is declared by the

man he accuses. Either that or an effort will be made to send him

to the asylum. Russell and Frank Shirley, brothers to the furniture

dealer, are more determined to punish the man than Mr. Shirley

himself. The latter does not take the affair quite so seriously. He

believes that Fisher should be adjudged insane.

All Tired of Him.

The warrant against him was issued by Russell Shirley.

Attorneys' fees are being paid by the man Fisher accuses. Mr.

Shirley Tuesday afternoon carried to the office of Chief Lanford a

number of books of his firm to prove his alibi on the day Mary

Phagan was slain. The chief laughingly gave a glace at the

volumes, then returned them, saying that no credence whatever

was put in the accusation.

Rosser and Arnold are through with Fisher. They have

literally washed their hands clean of him. Their only future

connection in any respect will be to pay his return fare to

Birmingham, which was promised by C. W. Burke, when the man

was brought to Atlanta. Burke, in talking to reporters, stated he

was unable to catch Fisher in a single falsehood.

Hicks Not Located.

Birmingham, Ala., October 21."(Special)"While he has no

warrant on which to arrest him, Chief of Police Bodeker said

tonight that he understood that Joe Hicks was an engineer on the

Louisville and Nashville road and runs between Etowah, Tenn.,

and Atlanta, or Etowah and Knoxville.

Chief Bodeker said that he had heard much of the Frank case

in the last week or so and that he did not believe Frank was

guilty, but had nothing definite at hand to work on.

He said he turned Fisher and his statement over on what it

was worth, and that was all he could say about that phase of the

case. The chief said he did not believe Hicks was in Birmingham.

PAGE 13, COLUMN 3

PROFESSIONAL

CARDS

P. H. Brewster, Albert Howell, Jr.

Hugh M. Dorsey, Arthur Heyman,

Dorsey, Brewster, Howell &

Herman,

Attorneys-at-Law.

Offices: 202, 204, 205, 206, 207,

208, 210

Kiser Building, Atlanta, Ga.

Long-Distance telephone 3022,

3024,

and 3025, Atlanta, Ga.

Wednesday, 22nd October 1913 Many Affidavits Defend The Jury
atlanta-constitution-october-22-1913-many-affidavits-defend-the-jury

Download PDF document here: atlanta-constitution-october-22-1913-many-affidavits-defend-the-jury

Related Posts